AFR Monitoring?

jacko996
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 11:48 pm

AFR Monitoring?

Postby jacko996 » Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:40 am

Can I monitor the afr from a standard sensor on Escort Cosworth??

If so can someone help with connections?

Thanks in advance

Jimster
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 11:06 pm
Location: Bridgend, South Wales
Contact:

Postby Jimster » Tue Dec 23, 2008 3:34 pm

isn't the lamda sensor on the cosworth a narrow band? if so you could simply connect into the signal and connect to to any free analogue input

jacko996
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 11:48 pm

Postby jacko996 » Tue Dec 23, 2008 7:46 pm

Jimster wrote:isn't the lamda sensor on the cosworth a narrow band? if so you could simply connect into the signal and connect to to any free analogue input


Yes I believe it is narrow band.

Im not that technically minded, can you explain about connections, and if I need to do anything else

Thanks
Dave

Dan in Saint Louis
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 10:26 pm
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri, USA

Postby Dan in Saint Louis » Tue Dec 23, 2008 11:15 pm

Jimster wrote:isn't the lamda sensor on the cosworth a narrow band? if so you could simply connect into the signal and connect to to any free analogue input

I'd be a little concerned about the output impedance of the sensor and the input impedance of the data logger. Unless the input impedance of the data logger is at 20 or so times higher, the sensor will be loaded down and produce inaccurate readings.

I have seen various numbers cited for the output impedance of the oxygen sensor. It definitely varies with temperature, and could be over 1 megohm cold, and as low as 10 kilohms hot.

I cannot find an input impedance spec for the DL1. If, like the DL2, it is around 100 kilohms; 10% of the output voltage of a HOT oxygen sensor (or ALL of the output of a cold sensor) would be lost by resistive loading (see also "Thevenin's equivalent").

There is some chance that this loading could work to the racer's benefit, as a lower output voltage would indicate a lean condition and the mixture computer would compensate by adding a little more fuel. Maximum engine power is not at lambda = 1, but more like 0.88. How practical this is will have to be determined by experimentation<G>.
--Dan in Saint Louis

Turby
Posts: 296
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 2:28 pm

Postby Turby » Wed Dec 24, 2008 9:59 am

Doesn't a narrow band lambda sensor simply switch produce a square wave output which toggles between rich and lean (stoichiometric air/fuel ratio) ?

See
http://www.lambdapower.co.uk/TechNotes/Tech-4.aspl

Only wideband lambda sensors actually give you a A/F ratio.
http://www.lambdapower.co.uk/TechNotes/Tech-8.asp

Dan in Saint Louis
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 10:26 pm
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri, USA

Postby Dan in Saint Louis » Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:25 pm

Turby wrote:Doesn't a narrow band lambda sensor simply switch produce a square wave output which toggles between rich and lean (stoichiometric air/fuel ratio) ?

See
http://www.lambdapower.co.uk/TechNotes/Tech-4.aspl

Only wideband lambda sensors actually give you a A/F ratio.
http://www.lambdapower.co.uk/TechNotes/Tech-8.asp

The most usual sensor does have a very steep response characteristic, but within some limits you can read lambda if you are willing to program the interpretation.

One designer offered this table:
    volts air/fuel Lambda
    (open circuit)
    =====================================
    .250 15.0:1 1.02
    .375 14.5:1 0.99
    .500 14.0:1 0.95
    .625 13.5:1 0.92
    .750 13.0:1 0.88
    .875 12.5:1 0.85
    1.000 12.0:1 0.82

You are correct that more accuracy can be obtained from a separate wide-band sensor, preferably not connected to the ECU.
--Dan in Saint Louis


Return to “General support questions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 258 guests